Friday, February 28, 2014


Text contains those laws in effect on February 27, 2014

§8. “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.

Judges will use this to rule against people in court, when the truth is that "death" occurs when the baby is registered.

(b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.

(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.

You are alive until you contract yourself into servitude? Or is it the play on words, a-live, as opposed to live, or life, or living, existance, being et al?

It certainly looks like word magic designed to paint a picture that a person isn't dead. 

Is a person a PERSON? 

Who gets to decide if you are presently living or dead? The law? Politicians?

(Added Pub. L. 107–207, §2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.)


Text contains those laws in effect on February 27, 2014

§108. Seven-year absence presumption of death

(a) No State law providing for presumption of death shall be applicable to claims for benefits under laws administered by the Secretary.

(b) If evidence satisfactory to the Secretary is submitted establishing the continued and unexplained absence of any individual from that individual's home and family for seven or more years, and establishing that after diligent search no evidence of that individual's existence after the date of disappearance has been found or received, the death of such individual as of the date of the expiration of such period shall be considered as sufficiently proved.

(c) Except in a suit brought pursuant to section 1984 of this title, the finding of death made by the Secretary shall be final and conclusive.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1112; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(7), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3291; Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(a)(1), (b)(1), (2)(E), 5(c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 403–406.)


1991-Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(1), substituted “administered by the Secretary” for “administered by the Veterans’ Administration”.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted “Secretary” for “Administrator”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted “1984” for “784”.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted “Secretary” for “Administrator”.

1986-Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–576 substituted “that individual's” for “his” in two places.


Judgment Creditor 
 A party to which a debt is owed that has proved the debt in a legal proceeding and that is entitled to use judicial process to collect the debt; the owner of an unsatisfied court decision.

A party that wins a monetary award in a lawsuit is known as a judgment creditor until the award is paid, or satisfied. The losing party, which must pay the award, is known as a Judgment Debtor. A judgment creditor is legally entitled to enforce the debt with the assistance of the court.

State laws provide remedies to a judgment creditor in collecting the amount of the judgment. These measures bring the debtor's property into the custody of the court in order to satisfy the debtor's obligation: they involve the seizure of property and money. The process of enforcing the judgment debt in this way is called execution. The process commences with a hearing called a supplementary proceeding. The judgment debtor is summoned to appear before the court for a hearing to determine the nature and value of the debtor's property. If the property is subject to execution, the court orders the debtor to relinquish it.

Because debtors sometimes fail to surrender property to the court, other means of satisfying the debt may be necessary. In these cases the law refers to an unsatisfied execution—an outstanding and unfulfilled order by the court for property to be given up. Usually this will lead the judgment creditor to seek a writ of attachment, the legal means by which property is seized. To secure a writ of attachment, the judgment creditor must first place a judgment lien on the property. Also called an encumbrance, a lien is a legal claim on the debtor's property that gives the creditor a qualified right to it. Creditors holding liens are called secured creditors. The writ of attachment sets in motion the process of a levy, by which a sheriff or other state official actually seizes the property and takes it into the physical possession of the court. The property can then be sold to satisfy the debt.

Occasionally the judgment creditor is frustrated in the course of enforcing a judgment debt. Debtors may transfer property to another owner, which makes collection through attachment more difficult. Liens on property usually prevent the transfer of ownership. Where a transfer of ownership has occurred, state laws usually allow the judgment creditor to sue the third party who now possesses the property. Some states provide additional statutory relief to creditors in cases where debtors fraudulently transfer assets in order to escape a judgment debt. Florida's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (Fla. Stat. § 726.101 et seq.), for instance, allows creditors more time to pursue enforcement of the debt.

Another process for recovery is Garnishment, which targets the judgment debtor's salary or income. Through garnishment a portion of the judgment debtor's income is regularly deducted and paid to the judgment creditor. The creditor is known as a garnishor, and the debtor as a garnishee.

Further readings

Lippman, Steven N. 1996. "Proceedings Supplementary and Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act: Dual Remedies to Execute Against a Judgment Debtor's Transferred Assets." Florida Bar Journal 70 (January).
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

judgment creditor 

n. the winning plaintiff in a lawsuit to whom the court decides the defendant owes money. A judgment creditor can use various means to collect the judgment. The judgment is good for a specified number of years and then may be renewed by a filed request. If the defendant debtor files for bankruptcy, the judgment creditor will have priority (the right to share in assets) ahead of general creditors who are not secured by mortgages or deeds of trust and do not have judgments. However, if the bankrupt person has no assets, this becomes an empty advantage. (See: judgment, prevailing party, creditor's rights)
Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.


debt·or  (dĕt′ər)
1. One that owes something to another.
2. One who is guilty of a trespass or sin; a sinner.

[Middle English dettour, from Old French dettor, from Latin dēbitor, from dēbitus, past participle of dēbēre, to owe; see debt.]
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

debtor (ˈdɛtə)
1. (Banking & Finance) a person or commercial enterprise that owes a financial obligation. Compare creditor
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003

debt•or (ˈdɛt ər)

a person, company, or nation in debt or under financial obligation.
[1250–1300; Middle English detto(u)r < Old French det(t)or < Latin dēbitōrem, acc. of dēbitor <dēbi-, variant s. of dēbēre (see debt)]
Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.
Thesaurus Legend:  Synonyms Related Words Antonyms
Noun1.debtor - a person who owes a creditor; someone who has the obligation of paying a debt
individual, mortal, person, somebody, someone, soul - a human being; "there was too much for one person to do"
deadbeat, defaulter - someone who fails to meet a financial obligation
fly-by-night - a debtor who flees to avoid paying
mortgager, mortgagor - the person who gives a mortgage in return for money to be repaid; "we became mortgagors when the bank accepted our mortgage and loaned us the money to buy our new home"
creditor - a person to whom money is owed by a debtor; someone to whom an obligation exists
Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. © 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.

noun borrower, mortgagor, loanee, drawee For every debtor there's a creditor.
Collins Thesaurus of the English Language – Complete and Unabridged 2nd Edition. 2002 © HarperCollins Publishers 1995, 2002

cred·i·tor  (krĕd′ĭ-tər)
One to whom money or its equivalent is owed.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

creditor (ˈkrɛdɪtə)
1. (Commerce) a person or commercial enterprise to whom money is owed. Compare debtor
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003

cred•i•tor (ˈkrɛd ɪ tər)

a person or firm to whom money is due.
[1400–50; late Middle English < Latin]
Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.
Thesaurus Legend:  Synonyms Related Words Antonyms
Noun1.creditor - a person to whom money is owed by a debtor; someone to whom an obligation exists
individual, mortal, person, somebody, someone, soul - a human being; "there was too much for one person to do"
mortgage holder, mortgagee - the person who accepts a mortgage; "the bank became our mortgagee when it accepted our mortgage on our new home"
debitor, debtor - a person who owes a creditor; someone who has the obligation of paying a debt
Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. © 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.



An uplifting and informative post written by Deck Ape in the fascist book group "Sui Juris Law For beginners"
On Jury Duty

Monday I went for jury duty in a state court in down town Chicago. I have been dying to get in some practice engaging with real judges, in a real court, where I am not a respondent or defendant.

I had a ball. And got the word out to about 2-3 dozen potential jurors, before 2 different judges, on the fraudulent, corporate statutes and codes, admiralty court vs common law court, your birth certificate bond, and whether any respondent/defendant knows they are corporations ( straw man).

In the first court room was a 40 something female judge. She was just sweet as pie and friendly, and gushing niceness to the potential jurors. Until I spoke.

The judge had stated a moment prior that she would give the jury final instructions after the trial finished. She stated she would point out the ‘LAW’ that applies to this case.

I immediately took issue with this statement.

I said it was my understanding that a ‘law’ is passed by both houses of the Illinois Assembly, published in the state register, and became law by enacting legislation. I began to repeat this explanation for all federal laws ( passed by both house of congress/published in the federal register/enacting legislation).

She interrupted me. Her tone was now most impatient.

So I cut to the chase. I looked her in the eye and said I have absolutely no use for the fraudulent statutes and codes.

Her evil exploded into the court room. She became vicious, and angry to the nth degree. And I might add, exposed herself to the potential jurors for what she truly is. Tee! Hee!

She told me I am dismissed and to immediately leave her court room. On my way out, almost to the door, where a few 20 somethings were sitting, to whom I had just explained what I was about to do here in court, I asked : ‘questions’?

The judge exploded in more anger, and yelled at me for speaking out loud in her court while she was speaking. I turned around, looked her in the eye, put my best Cheshire cat grin on my face, and ‘apologized’.

In the hall, the sheriff deputy/bailiff ( a young black woman), said the judge told her I was ‘disruptive’, and if I continued ( I was being returned to the jury pool room for possible further callup), I would be jailed. I told her it would not be the first time. Nor do I succumb to intimidation.

I also told her this is OUR house. Not the lawyers and the judges. She was freaked out by my oratory. And calm, fearless demeanor.

In the afternoon call, this judge was a very senior, savvy jurist. He asked if anyone did NOT take the oath for jurists. I raised my hand, much to the shock of the potential jury pool. (He had just given the same speech as the earlier judge)

He asked why I did not take the oath. I pointed out: 

1.) the gold fringe on the flag and said this is an admiralty law court, not a common law court

2.) That the judge and the lawyers were members of the British Accredited Registry ( Bar), were foreign agents, and were beholden to the Crown, not their client

3.)that I sincerely doubt the plaintiff or the defendant ( this was a rear end collision traffic case where the plaintiff suffered injuries and was suing for damages) know they are considered dead/lost at sea, that they are lunatics, that it was their corporate straw man that was summoned before the court, because of their birth certificate bond

4.) that the court cannot hear them without an enter for appearance and declaration of being a live person with a soul. 

And that this ‘court’ was for commerce between corporations, and he was just an administrator, not a judge here to dispense justice.
Then I told him I have no use for the fraudulent statutes and codes, and could not rule according to the law ( actually the statutes and codes), in my jury deliberations, because this court would refer to the statutes and codes, not the law.

Unfortunately I never got to bring up jury nullification. Oh well…
The judge was very cool about the whole thing.

He admitted this was an admiralty court, and that the BAR members first loyalty was to the Crown, and that the plaintiff/respondents were, in fact, straw man corporations. 

He was sympathetic to my view point, and did not hold it against me.
He allowed both lawyers to question me as part of their normal course of jury selection. 

In the end, BOTH lawyers wanted no part of me. Tee! Hee!
My actions educated the potential jurors. My candor also opened up a most remarkable dialogue between potential jurors, the judge, and the lawyers. I removed the fear, and folks spoke their mind.

I was pleasantly surprised, and most pleased.
And I succeeded in my quest, to get out of jury duty.

I did it honestly, and sincerely, with no BS involved.

And opened more than one set of eyes to what is really going on.

My time with Rod Class, Jordan Maxwell, Pete Hendrickson, Dave Krieger, Stop The Pirates Blog Spot, and Winston Shrout, was time well spent.

I feel GREAT!!!

Thursday, February 27, 2014



swissindo god sky earth orbitThe Promise of OPPT

The OPPT (One People's Public Trust) promised to free humanity from corporate power by using its legal framework to make claims against major players in the modern power structures that could not be rebutted. Without a rebuttal, the theory goes, the claim is upheld and becomes law by default. Started by a UCC lawyer, the OPPT declared they had a superior claim to pretty much the world's entire wealth and that by absorbing all the corporate and government trusts on the planet. All this wealth, or 'ill gotten gain', would be redistributed to every man, woman and child on the planet to the tune of around $6 million USD each.

The SWISSINDO Deception

Freedom actrivists from all over the world were attracted to OPPT, looking like a lawful way to bring down the ruling class from their perch and introduce true equality to the world. Don't worry about the trust they are told, the trust requires nothing of you and your participation is completely voluntary. The OPPT itself has made the filings, fulfilled its purpose and dissolved itself, leaving us al to figure out where to go from here. This part of the story leads us to believe that all involved are operating in an anti-hierarchical nature to prevent an elite ruling class to simply replace the old one. From OPPT, came SWISSINDO with the mission of fulfilling the promise of the OPPT filings. One activist who was involved as an Australian delegate named Pieta Morgan discovered that this was a deception and reached out to TWOT to tell her story and provide documentation of their real plans for humanity. This plan appears to be a partnership with the United Nations in a bid for global government. This plan appears to be a partnership with the United Nations in a bid for global government. In fact, SWISSINDO appears to be another front for the United Nations New world Order Agenda, wrapping their dangerous collectivist ideaology into a 'New Age' package to create a new cult of control freaks.

So what is SWISSINDO? While OPPT was meant to dissolve the existing heirarchy of corporatocracy and return the wealth of the world back to the rest of humanity, SWISSINDO seeks to fill the vaccuum and basically put a new face on it. At the top of this pyramid, or at least the capstone that faces the public, is personified by an Indonesian person named MR SOEGIHARTO, who is dubbed "The King of Kings". This self-styled king-of-the-world proclaims to be the man who will save humanity sitting atop his alleged masses of gold that will be used to back a new world currency; the Chinese Yuan. Yes, the SWISSINDO crowd say that they will replace the US dollar with the Chinese Yuan as the world reserve trading currency and this will be backed by gold. You won't be able to exchange the totalitarian regime's paper fiat currency for gold at the bank, but you should just take their word for it.

SWSSINDO power structure 

The King of the World and His Emperors

According to former insider and whistleblower Pieta Morgan, 100 delegates from around the world will be attending a coronation ceremony on March 11, 2014 for the 'king of kings', MR SOEGIHARTO in Cirebon, Indonesia. They will allegedly be joined by various world leaders who have been invited to attend such as US President Barrack Obama and Queen Elizabeth II. The 100 delegates are then required to remain in Indonesia until sometime around June, for reasons that we can only speculate.

The image on the right comes from an internal document and shows a power flow chart that outlines the proposed new hierarchy that is to run the world. As you can see, the 'king of kings' sits atop several layers of 'royal' authority down to a series of emperors delegated to each continent. Prime Ministers etc sit below these appointed emperors. Sounds really representative and accountable doesn't it? No it doesn't sound that way to me either.

This is the sort of typical collectivist madness to be expected from the United Nations; a completely unrepresentative and undemocratic institution comprised of tyrants pretending to be saviours of the Earth.

My interview with Pieta was given within hours of her public outting of SWISSINDO and their global bid for a UN backed global power grab and was a bit rushed. This was followed by a large data dump of files revealing much of what has been discussed here. These and some revealing phone conversations and recordings will be published here at TWOT shortly to further expose the SWISSINDO scam. A follow up interview will be conducted and posted shortly to bring all the threads together and bring further context to bizarre and ambitious plot to bring in the New World Order.

Below is a propaganda video from SWISSINDO posted on YouTube explaining the pretense for their agenda.

Tuesday, February 25, 2014


There has been organised for this Saturday afternoon/evening coming the 1st of March an O.S.T.F treaty ceremony in St Kilda at the boonwurrong corroboree tree.

Cnr St Kilda Rd and Nepean High way St Kilda

It will be held in a treed area on the south east side of the park that runs along the St Kilda junction.

this will be held AFTER the Truthologie seminar (what ever time that finishes) on Saturday.................

it will cost you nothing and everyone is invited.

close up picture of map of area.

Wider view of area.

Saturday, February 22, 2014


Surveillance video helped a man uncover the truth. 

A police car going the wrong way on a one way street hit a parked vehicle.

But, the man waiting inside the SUV was arrested. 

The video, he says, –Why doesn't the media agree with the clear video footage? It looks like the man is claiming something other than the truth– shows he should not have been arrested and that the cops fabricated the story.

"I was embarrassed, I couldn't even stop from them crying, I just kept telling them from the window that everything was going to be alright," said Robert Jackson, crash victim.

But Jackson didn't think it would be alright, until he got the tape. 

The video starts with a police cruiser going the wrong way on the narrow street in Brownsville.

If there is an emergency or a reason for going the wrong way, it's unclear, –The media is trying to defend the cops with lies, if there was an emergency they would have sirens and lights activated, there would be police radio chatter, if there was a  genuine reason like a crime being committed, or an escapee noticed or the like, the officers would've been moving to the emergency instead of processing a charge & the corporate media itself would've been full of stories about the emergency. No. There was no emergency. The police broke the law & the media is defending them to the hilt– and the cruiser quickly has to get out of the way of an approaching truck, that's when the cruiser hits the parked SUV Robert Jackson was sitting in, waiting for his family. 

"They hit the back end of the truck. The truck had a little rock to it, so that's I assume them backing it up," Jackson said. 

Jackson got out of the car to address the matter with the police, who started looking at the car for damage. 

Jackson couldn't believe what the officers were saying.

"They said it was me that hit them. That's when I put my hand up like I couldn't believe this was even happening to me," Jackson said. 

Jackson says the police then spent time in the neighborhood looking for surveillance cameras.

There are several, as Eyewitness News saw on the street. 

Whether the police saw them or not is unclear, –the police need to see a camera before they will obey the law? but they did arrest Jackson and charged him with damaging public property and resisting arrest. 

And in the cruiser on the way to the precinct, Jackson says one of the officers explained why it was going down this way.

"He was telling me he wasn't going to lose his $750,000 home over me. 

And I said, 'whoa!'" Jackson said. 

The charges against Jackson were later dropped. If he had been convicted of the charges against him, Jackson could have faced up to a year in jail. Jackson is now suing the city.